Tuesday, February 17, 2015

WHAT’S WRONG WITH THE STRIKE ZONE?


The Rob Manfred revolution continues to march on. After talking about Pete Rose, Joe Maddon, and the defensive shift, it looks like Manfred wants to change the strike zone. That’s right, Major League Baseball is considered a change to the rules to change the dimensions of the strike zone. It seems that productive batting across baseball is in decline, and that baseball needs to do something to correct that. Nevertheless, is this the right solution?


Ever since 1887, the rules define the strike zone as being over the plate, from the shoulders to the knees. Over the years, there have been small adjustments to that definition. Most notably, in 1996, the Playing Rules Committee changed the lower portion of the strike zone from the top of the knee to the bottom of the knee. The intent was to encourage umpires, who notoriously used to set their own strike zones, to call lower strikes. Then along came Questec system – a computerized pitching analyzer that determines balls and strikes. It is highly accurate, enough so that MLB uses it to grade umpires. No surprise, umpires started calling lower strikes. Over time, this caused an “expansion” of the strike zone.


In recent years, the number of runs per game has steadily dropped. In 2006, baseball scored 4.86 runs per game. In 2014, that number fell to 4.07. In fact, last year was the first year that baseball teams scored fewer than 20000 runs since the strike-shortened 1995 season. This becomes a problem for baseball. The fact is that hitting is more popular than pitching. Fans get more excited seeing a 5-run rally than they do watching a 1-0 pitchers’ duel.


When I first read about this, I did not think it was a good idea. There is something just does seems inherently wrong about changing the rules because you do not like the outcomes of games. Run production is down, so why not change the rules to bring it up. Let’s make it easier for hitters to get hits, get on base, and score more runs. Instead of expanding the strike zone, why don’t we just give hitters an aluminum bat?? However, when I read the details about this change, the more it made sense. This change is about reversing an adjustment to the strike zone made at a time when enforcement was impossible. With Questec, we have a better way to make umpires stick to a standard strike zone.


This season baseball will be watching the relationship between called strikes and hitting productivity. Based on their observations, they may change the rules for the 2016 season. Regardless, baseball needs to get this right and stick to a standard definition of the strike zone. If the rules change, pitchers will need a better out pitch than the hard-to-hit low strike. It is not fair to pitchers to make them adjust to a moving target.



--Ike Dimitriadis, BYB Senior Staff Writer
Twitter: @KingAgamemnon
My blog is: Shots from Murderer's Row



Be Read. Get Known.


You've made BYB the fastest growing Yankees fan site in history. Now shop at the Bleeding Yankee Blue store!  Follow me on Twitter @BleednYankeeBlu and LIKE Bleeding Yankee Blue on Facebook!  Also, don't forget to check out the BYB Hub!

No comments:

Post a Comment

Thank you for commenting on Bleeding Yankee Blue.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.