PETE ROSE IS ELIGIBLE, BUT WILL THE WRITERS DO THE RIGHT THING?

The first ballplayer I ever saw live was Pete Rose. Lexington, Kentucky, mid-1970s. I was just a kid, but even then, I knew I was watching something special — the guy was a machine. Not a “launch angle” or “exit velocity” machine like today’s stat-sheet nerds. The dude was full-throttle, headfirst-sliding, never-met-a-fastball-he-didn’t-like hit machine. And he just kept going.

To me, that mattered more than anything else. Not the headlines. Not the scandals. Not the whispers and bans. Just a guy who played like the game owed him nothing, and he was going to outwork it anyway.

So, when people wring their hands over what Pete did off the field — the gambling, the ban, the puritanical pearl-clutching — I’ve always thought: Who cares? Not me. Play hard, play honest between the lines — that’s baseball. The rest is just noise.

But then, irony rears its roided-out head. You’ve got the steroid-era guys — Bonds, Clemens, McGwire — who, yes, juiced to hit harder, throw faster, recover quicker… you know, for the actual game. The part we judge them on for the Hall of Fame and the MLB let them play. In fact, they were in on it because baseball was dying after the 1994 strike and we needed baseball back, after all. But yet, the writers hold a moral ground, and they get iced out. The same moral guardians of the Hall let Harold Baines stroll in — a solid player, sure, but let’s not pretend he was a generational talent — while holding back titans of the sport because they broke the "unwritten rules."

Here's the kicker: MLB never even banned those steroid guys. But the BBWAA blackballed them anyway. The writers have taken it upon themselves to be the ethical gatekeepers of the game, when maybe they should just be the historians. Because whether we like it or not, history happened.

And now, we’ve got this strange, sad, cosmic joke. Rob Manfred, in his infinite PR-savvy wisdom, finally removes Pete Rose from the permanently ineligible list — but only after Pete dies. Dead men, it turns out, no longer threaten the "integrity of the game."

"Obviously, a person no longer with us cannot represent a threat to the integrity of the game," Manfred wrote. "Permanent ineligibility ends upon death." What a gesture. So meaningful. So… late.

Look, I’m grateful Pete is eligible now. That’s the right call. But it should’ve come while he could still appreciate it. The punishment was decades old. As far as I could see, he did his time. So, what did we get from Manfred? We got a delayed half-apology masquerading as a policy update.

Now it’s up to the writers. Again. They hold the pen, and the power, and maybe — just maybe — the conscience to finally do what’s right. Let Pete in. Let Shoeless Joe in. Both are eligible now. And while we're at it, let the steroid-era guys be considered on merit, not morality. They played the game. They broke records. They defined eras. That’s the job.

Stop pretending the Hall of Fame is a shrine to virtue. It’s not. It never was. It’s a museum of greatness — flawed, complicated, brilliant greatness. And no one embodied that better than Pete Rose.

So thanks, Pete. For playing your guts out. For being the first player I ever saw. For being the greatest I ever saw. They might’ve buried your legacy under bureaucracy and self-righteousness, but now, maybe, they’ll finally let it breathe.

Manfred got it technically right. But he missed the moment. The human moment. Again.