For the third time in four years, Clayton Kershaw has been named the
Cy Young Award winner for the National League, and now, the guy has also won the MVP. Mike Trout won it for the American League.
Clayton's Cy Young award was announced Wednesday
by a unanimous vote as the Los Angeles Dodgers’ ace posted a 21-3
season record with a 1.77 ERA in the 2014 campaign. More impressive—he
was able to rack up all those wins while also being on the disabled list
for six weeks early in the season. With the award, the Dodger lefty becomes one of nine pitchers to earn
three Cy Young Awards. At age 26, he’s also the youngest pitcher to do
so.
There’s no denying that Kershaw is one of the greatest pitchers in
the game today. Living in LA and following the Dodgers, I get to see
Kershaw perform his magic every five days. He is a big reason the
Dodgers—who were over-hyped this season IMHO—were able to hold off the
Giants in the NL West and advance to the postseason.
The one blemish for Kershaw is his performance in the playoffs—the
lefty has a career postseason record of 1-5 with a 5.13 ERA in 11 games.
He made Dodger history this season as he became the first pitcher to
lose four consecutive postseason starts (all to the Cardinals).
So yeah, the Cy Young is Kershaw's, but the next question was... could he also win the MVP? It's Kershaw... darn straight.
Before Kershaw won the National League MVP, the last time a pitcher was given that award was back in 1968 when
Bob Gibson won after posting a 1.12 ERA. Many players and fans feel
that only position players should be considered for the MVP award since
pitchers already have the Cy Young recognition and they only play every
five days. Even Dodgers’ manager Don Mattingly—a 1985 AL MVP—once held
the opinion that pitchers should not be considered no matter what. But
it seems that Donnie Baseball may be changing his tune as he has
endorsed Kershaw’s recent MVP candidacy.
As MLB.com reports, Mattingly stated that his opinion changed after he saw what a player like Kershaw could do for an organization. "I
flip-flopped from when I played, but as a manager, you just see the
value of what a guy like Clayton's been able to do. I do think it needs
to be one of those years where it seems like it's almost extraordinary,
and it seems to be one of those years."
I agree with Mattingly that a pitcher should be awarded MVP for
extraordinary performance and shouldn’t be excluded from consideration. I
think Kershaw has consistently shown in his young career that he is one
of the best in baseball, but, I must say, his inability to deliver in the postseason
gave me doubts as to whether he should have been awarded MVP when there are
multiple players out there that have come through in the clutch.
Ultimately though, Kershaw got it. So here's the question. Did Kershaw deserve the MVP? I’d love to hear your
thoughts in the comments—do you think pitchers should be able to win the
MVP award, or should it only apply to position players? Was there
someone more worthy than Kershaw? Let us know.
--Alexis Garcia, BYB's "Eye on MLB" Columnist
Twitter: @heylexyg
You've made BYB the fastest growing Yankees fan site in history. Now shop at the Bleeding Yankee Blue store! Follow me on Twitter @BleednYankeeBlu and LIKE Bleeding Yankee Blue on Facebook!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting on Bleeding Yankee Blue.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.